Accepted but forgotten truths


We universally accept and acknowledge accessibility as a crucial aspect of web development, much like acknowledging terms of service before hitting "I agree." We all nod in agreement, understanding its significance, but it's crucial not to forget that accessibility doesn't magically just happen. It demands intentional effort and continuous commitment.

We start projects with a burst of enthusiasm marked by grand gestures, lofty goals and inspiring speeches. We run workshops, empathy labs, and create mood boards. We firmly agree that our product should be inclusive for everyone. Meetings are held, plans are made, and vows are taken to prioritise accessibility from beginning to end.

And as the project gains momentum, that initial fervor tends to dissipate faster than morning dew. We push accessibility considerations aside, conveniently postponing them for the next sprint or the one after that.

Sound familiar?

Of course it does! It's every sprint ever.

It's a pattern that perfectly mirrors the way we interact with terms of service. We acknowledge, accept, and promptly forget amidst the rush of project timelines and competing priorities. This collective amnesia poses a constant challenge, as accessibility often takes a backseat. The key lies in understanding that accessibility, like any other integral project element, requires ongoing attention, not just lip service at the project's outset and in feel-good meetings.

Building an accessible website requires a mindset shift, extending beyond being a mere checkbox-ticking exercise. To fight this collective forgetfulness, incorporating regular checkpoints, continuous education, and fostering a culture that values inclusiveness can be transformative.

It's time to recognise that only consistent effort turns accepted truths into meaningful action. We need to bridge the gap between feel-good talks and the practical integration of accessibility into our daily routine.

Ship accessible websites. Faster.

Join fellow like-minded product owners looking to learn and contribute to authentic conversations on accessibility and inclusive design packed into just 5 minutes a day.

Read more from Ship accessible websites. Faster.

Does this sound familiar? The meeting was scheduled for 9:00 but somehow at 9:06 Zoom still says "Waiting for host to start the meeting." When it finally starts, the organiser casually mutters "sorry, previous thing ran long" while fumbling with screen sharing. It's okay though, because they'll happily steal those minutes back by running fifteen minutes over the scheduled end time. Everyone waiting lost those first minutes. And everyone with a follow-up commitment will nervously look at the...

It's very tempting to hand over responsibility over accessibility to other people. If you're a developer, it's the designer's job. If you're the designer, the developer needs to implement accessibility. If you're the product owner, it's the tester's job to make sure everything works with assistive technology. This is easy. Because if someone else accepts responsibility, then we're off the hook. I see two problems with this: 1. Someone else must always be willing to accept the responsibility...

Accessibility. 13 letters. We thought it was such a lenghty word that we use the numeronym a11y to write it out. It has all these definitions floating around, each one just slightly different than the next. I think the reason why we can't settle on just one is simply because, like the word itself, accessibility is a loaded concept. It's just like a bulky piece of luggage you lug around and when you finally set it down on the floor and start to unpack, it'll likely fill the room. The...